His name means spotless, and his page is a good place to watch Jain iconography borrow. The animal on his pedestal is Vishnu’s boar. The deity standing beside him is Shiva’s six-faced son under another name. Neither was taken by mistake, and neither is usually pointed out.
The Five Kalyanakas
| Kalyanaka | Tithi | Nakshatra |
|---|---|---|
| Chyavana (conception) | Vaishakha Shukla 12 | Uttara Bhadrapada |
| Janma (birth) | Magha Shukla 3 | Uttara Bhadrapada |
| Diksha (renunciation) | Magha Shukla 4 | Uttara Bhadrapada |
| Kevala Jnana (omniscience) | Paush Shukla 6 | Uttara Bhadrapada |
| Nirvana (liberation) | Ashadha Krishna 7 | Revati (shifts) |
Only one row here needs translating between calendars. The nirvana, Ashadha Krishna 7, is the single dark-fortnight date in his table; on a Gujarati amanta panchang it is Jeth vad 7, one month earlier by name and not by a day. The other four are bright-fortnight dates and read the same in either reckoning. His birth on Magha Shukla 3 and his renunciation on Magha Shukla 4, one lunar day apart, are the pattern most of the twenty-four follow, where the diksha tithi sits immediately after the janma tithi in the same fortnight.
His first four kalyanakas fall in Uttara Bhadrapada. Only the nirvana moves, to Revati, the next nakshatra along and the last of the twenty-seven. That is a one-step forward shift, the well-behaved kind; roughly ten of the twenty-four shift at the nirvana, and this is among the least surprising of them. It also means his death star is the birth star of two other Tirthankaras, Anantanatha immediately after him and Aranatha later. The kalyanaka calendar sets the whole pattern out.
A Boar, and a Six-Faced Yaksha
Both of his principal identifiers come from outside Jainism, and both were absorbed rather than avoided.
The lanchhana is a boar, varaha. In the Brahmanical scheme Varaha is the third avatar of Vishnu, the boar who lifts the drowned earth on his tusk, and that is the single most familiar thing the animal means in Indian art. Jain sculptors put it under the thirteenth Tirthankara without commentary, and both sects carve it there. Whatever the emblem originally distinguished, nobody in the tradition seems to have been troubled by the overlap.
The yaksha is more striking. Shanmukha means six-faced, and Shanmukha is one of the standard names of Karttikeya, Skanda, Shiva’s son, the six-headed war god of the Brahmanical pantheon. He stands as the attendant of a Jina who renounced war along with everything else. Digambara lists sometimes substitute Patala, who also attends Anantanatha; Shvetambara lists keep Shanmukha.
The yakshi is Vidita in Shvetambara sources. Digambara sources give Vairoti or Gandhari, and Gandhari is a name that turns up repeatedly across the set, attached to Naminatha in one tradition and to Vasupujya in the other.
None of this is dilution. It is the thing our Claim Your Story mission keeps pointing at: Jain art did not build a sealed visual vocabulary and defend its borders. It took the images the subcontinent already had, put them where it wanted them, and let the meaning follow the placement. A boar under a Jina is not Vishnu’s boar any more, and a six-faced attendant of a Tirthankara is not Skanda. But the shapes came from somewhere, and pretending otherwise makes the tradition smaller than it was.
Kampilya, Out of the Mahabharata
His kalyanaka-bhumi is Kampilya, identified with the town of Kampil in Uttar Pradesh, and it is a place the Mahabharata got to first.
Kampilya was the capital of southern Panchala, King Drupada’s city, where the Pandavas came for Draupadi’s swayamvara. It is a Mahabharata place before it is a Jain place in the popular imagination, and the two claims sit on the same ground rather than competing; excavation at the site has turned up remains indicating that a number of Jain temples once stood there.
Four of his five kalyanakas belong to Kampilya. His diksha was taken at Sahasramravana, the thousand-mango grove outside the city, which is where a large number of the twenty-four renounce and which functions in the texts as a standard setting rather than a distinctive one; Vasupujya’s departure from it is conspicuous precisely because almost nobody else departs from it. The fifth kalyanaka, the liberation, was at Shikharji, where he is one of the twenty released and where a tonk enshrines his footprints.
Where the Sects Count Differently
Vimalanatha is, as Jainpedia puts it, not one of the more popular Jinas, and his biography is correspondingly thin. What the two traditions do preserve, they do not always preserve identically, and the differences are small, concrete and worth listing rather than blurring.
| Shvetambara | Digambara | |
|---|---|---|
| Ganadharas | 57 | 51 |
| Mother | Shyama, also given as Soma | Jayashyama |
| Yaksha | Shanmukha | Shanmukha, or Patala |
| Yakshi | Vidita | Vairoti, or Gandhari |
His father is Kritavarma in both. The emblem, the boar, is agreed in both. Neither list is a corruption of the other; these are two transmissions of the same material that have drifted at the edges over a very long time, and the honest way to print them is side by side.
Hemachandra records that 6,000 munis attained liberation with him, which puts him third in the whole set behind Rishabhanatha’s 10,000 and Anantanatha’s 7,000, and well ahead of the round thousand that most of his neighbours in the sequence are given. His height is put at sixty bows and his lifespan at six million years, both figures belonging to the cosmological register of the text rather than to anything measurable.
Where the record is thin we would rather say so than fill the space. There is no founding episode attached to him of the kind Shantinatha or Mallinatha carries, and no naming story of the kind Hemachandra gives Naminatha or Kunthunatha. His name simply means spotless. If you know of sourced material from a classical commentary or a sangh publication we have missed, tell us and we will add it with the citation.
[← Vasupujya](/tirthankara/vasupujya/) · [All 24](/tirthankara-astrology/) · [Anantanatha →](/tirthankara/anantanatha/)
Uttara Bhadrapada, and a Star Held by One
Uttara Bhadrapada is the twenty-sixth nakshatra, in Meena, and among the twenty-four it is Vimalanatha’s alone as a birth star. That makes the kinship exclusive: no other Tirthankara’s kalyanaka days overlap with yours on this basis.
It does appear once more in the tables, though, and in an interesting position. It is the star of Vasupujya’s nirvana, the twelfth Tirthankara, immediately before him. So the star that opens the thirteenth Tirthankara’s life is the star under which the twelfth left his, and if you keep both days you are keeping a handover.
That is a pattern, not a portent, and we should say so before anyone builds anything on it. What a shared janma nakshatra gives you is a set of dates you can observe, a life you can read and an image you can stand in front of. It does not give you a temperament or a forecast, and no classical Jain source has ever claimed it does. The argument in full is at why no honest Tirthankara horoscope can exist.
Our free kundali tool computes your janma nakshatra and names the Tirthankaras who share it. The cross-verified table for all twenty-four is at the birth stars of the 24 Tirthankaras.
Sources. Kalyanaka tithis and the Uttara Bhadrapada to Revati shift, and the figure of 6,000 liberated with him: Hemachandra's Trishashti-Shalaka-Purusha-Charitra, Johnson's translation. Emblem, colour, parentage by sect, the diksha at Sahasramravana outside Kampilya, the ganadhara counts of 57 and 51, and the attendant deities by sect: Jainpedia's entry on Vimala, which also records that he is not among the more popular Jinas, cross-checked against Wikipedia. Height of 60 bows and lifespan of 6,000,000 years: the same sources, reported as the texts' own cosmological figures. Kampilya as the capital of southern Panchala, Drupada's city and the site of Draupadi's swayamvara, its identification with modern Kampil, and the excavated indications of Jain temples there: standard historical references. The identification of Shanmukha with the six-faced Karttikeya and of the boar with Varaha are observations about shared iconographic vocabulary, not claims that the Jain tradition derived its figures from Brahmanical ones. Corrections are seva: tell us.